Is censorship necessary? Essay

With the advent of impudent media, the dissemination of in buildation has reached an unparalleled scale, obstetrical delivery to the fore the inevitable reality of censoring. The roll in the hay of security review has been a subjectious unmatchable and conservatives wall for its instatement while liberals dispute its existence. In my opinion, I think that a form of censorship has to be put in place to maintain golf-club in a society and protect the late from malignant confine. However, numerous dispute the achievement to which censorship should be put in place, arguing that censorship is a aright weapon which kitty be handle by depraved individuals. Besides, they too argue that censorship is an ineffective tool in fulfilling its said purpose.Firstly, censorship remains unconditional in maintaining send in a society. It impedes the dissemination of ungoernable content on the lucre, thereby preventing any form of unfit social discourse and maintaining harmony among battalion. The finish up of the internet age has empowered people to voice by their own opinions whilst butt the perceived security of their keyboard. This freedom of dialect enabled by the internet inevitably calls for or so form of oversight over its users. non long ago, online furore erupted over disreputable sex bloggers Alvin and Vivian, who posted a moving picture of themselves eating Bak Kut Teh or pork ribs soup.What designerd the c atomic number 18n here was the catchline of the photo which read, Happy breaking fast in english. This resulted in a huge uproar from the muslim partnership as many felt that he was making a mockery out of the muslim tradition of fasting and self-restraint from pork. Such racially insensitive remarks dexterity damage the social fabric of a society, resulting in undesirable social implications and disrupting the racial harmony of a society. With censorship, much(prenominal) seditious content can be contained and order will be pre served.censorship is excessively necessary to protect the upstart from the hordes of ruffianly and sexual content found on the media. Along with the expansion of the internet, malicious content has pro mannerrated across the media. Youths of today ar beingness exposed to the media from a very new(a) age and they are highly susceptible to influence from the media. Reality television shows such as WWE(World Wrestling Entertainment) portray scenes of rage as men take on one some other in wrestling. What is particularly worrying here is thatmost of these scenes are acted out and amplified for dramatic effect. Young children whitethorn non be able to observe reality from the virtual world and they whitethorn be influenced by the violent content. plot there is no hard scientific data or causal plug in between media violence and real life aggression, psychiatrists have proven with empirical register that constant exposure to violent content ultimately has an impact on behavio ur. Besides, the proliferation of sexy content on the internet is another cause for concern.With the internet, filth is easily tender to children and bush league are viewing pornography at a very young age. The extreme nature of pornography faculty distort their views on relationships and promote a more liberal and permissive spatial relation towards sex among teenagers. This might be the cause of the rise in teenage pregnancies ,sexually genetical diseases and other societal issues. In this respect, we can clearly see the need for censorship on the internet in order to protect the young from being negatively influenced by the media.However, censorship is a ruling weapon which can be abuse by depraved individuals as tools of onerousness. In authoritarian states where the media is controlled by the state, censorship allows for the officer to have complete control over its people. wedlock Korea comes to mind where censorship and oppression is concern. The state-controlled media in North Korea censors more or less everything from the outside world and selectively reveals schooling to the people. This carefully orchestrated media campaign is use to boost the image of their supreme attracter Kim Jong Un and build a cult of character around him. Censorship in North Korea likewise helps in manipulating the masses. By barricade find to the outside world, people are unable to be discerning somewhat the training they receive from the state media and they are blinded from the truth. From this perspective, we can see how censorship, when employ unwisely, becomes a tool of oppression.Lastly, censorship is also ineffective in fulfilling its purpose and it is, in some cases, self defeating. Censorship has tending(p) rise to what is now known as the Streisand effect- whereby the act of trying to suppress randomness results in the greater spread of the information in question. Where censorship is practiced, there would surely be attempts tocircumvent th e system and access the censored content. Such is the case of the big Firewall of China. While it is considered by many to be a huge success, there has been many methods of bypassing the system since its instatement in 2003. This illustrates the ineffectiveness of censorship in withholding information from the people. In this regard, we can see that censorship is not the best method in modulate the media.To sum up, i think that although censorship is not entirely advantageous to the people, it is mollify imperative in protecting the interests of minors and maintaining order in a society. Censorship acts as a regulator of the internet and it is something which will remain relevant in time to come.